Difference between revisions of "Mason & Dixon Reviews"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''06/12/97 - [[Entropology|The New York Review of Books]]''' Louis Menand: "By appropriating the loose and baggy forms of Sterne and Swift, Pynchon has found an ideal vehicle for his meditation on the worlds that were lost, and the suffering that was caused, just so people could understand one another better. He has produced a work of cultural anthropology, a ''Tristes Tropiques'' of North American civilization, and an astonishing and wonderful book." | '''06/12/97 - [[Entropology|The New York Review of Books]]''' Louis Menand: "By appropriating the loose and baggy forms of Sterne and Swift, Pynchon has found an ideal vehicle for his meditation on the worlds that were lost, and the suffering that was caused, just so people could understand one another better. He has produced a work of cultural anthropology, a ''Tristes Tropiques'' of North American civilization, and an astonishing and wonderful book." | ||
− | '''06/97''' - [http://www.altx.com/ebr/reviews/rev8/r8hinds.htm Electronic Book Review] - Elizabeth Jane Wall Hinds: "Beyond the "factual" history, what Mason & Dixon more elegantly delivers is a history re-imagined, an alternative to recorded history, in the form of what one might call the "paranormal": reading Mason & Dixon is like a visit to Charles Wilson Peale's museum, itself an eighteenth-century creation, with its oddities and "freaks of nature" just close enough to verifiable facticity to look believable..." | + | '''06/97''' - [http://www.altx.com/ebr/reviews/rev8/r8hinds.htm '''Electronic Book Review'''] - Elizabeth Jane Wall Hinds: "Beyond the "factual" history, what Mason & Dixon more elegantly delivers is a history re-imagined, an alternative to recorded history, in the form of what one might call the "paranormal": reading Mason & Dixon is like a visit to Charles Wilson Peale's museum, itself an eighteenth-century creation, with its oddities and "freaks of nature" just close enough to verifiable facticity to look believable..." |
− | '''05/18/97''' - [http://www.nytimes.com/books/97/05/18/reviews/970518.18boylet.html?_r=1&oref=slogin New York Times Book Review] - T. Coraghessan Boyle: "This is the old Pynchon, the true Pynchon, the best Pynchon of all. ''Mason & Dixon'' is a groundbreaking book, a book of heart and fire and genius, and there is nothing quite like it in our literature, except maybe ''V.'' and ''Gravity's Rainbow.''" | + | '''05/18/97''' - [http://www.nytimes.com/books/97/05/18/reviews/970518.18boylet.html?_r=1&oref=slogin '''New York Times Book Review'''] - T. Coraghessan Boyle: "This is the old Pynchon, the true Pynchon, the best Pynchon of all. ''Mason & Dixon'' is a groundbreaking book, a book of heart and fire and genius, and there is nothing quite like it in our literature, except maybe ''V.'' and ''Gravity's Rainbow.''" |
− | '''04/29/97''' - [http://www.nytimes.com/books/97/04/27/daily/pynchon-book-review.html New York Times] - Michiko Kakutani: "As rendered by Pynchon, ''Mason & Dixon'' is not simply the story of these two men's intertwined lives and their personal search for knowledge. It's also a hugely ambitious epic about America and the Age of Reason and the origins of modernity that showcases all of Pynchon's prodigious gifts as a writer: his magician's ability to fuse history and fable, science and science fiction; his Swiftean grasp of satire and his vaudevillian's sense of farce. It is a book that testifies to his remarkable powers of invention and his sheer power as a storyteller, a storyteller who this time demonstrates that he can write a novel that is as moving as it is cerebral, as poignant as it is daring." | + | '''04/29/97''' - [http://www.nytimes.com/books/97/04/27/daily/pynchon-book-review.html '''New York Times'''] - Michiko Kakutani: "As rendered by Pynchon, ''Mason & Dixon'' is not simply the story of these two men's intertwined lives and their personal search for knowledge. It's also a hugely ambitious epic about America and the Age of Reason and the origins of modernity that showcases all of Pynchon's prodigious gifts as a writer: his magician's ability to fuse history and fable, science and science fiction; his Swiftean grasp of satire and his vaudevillian's sense of farce. It is a book that testifies to his remarkable powers of invention and his sheer power as a storyteller, a storyteller who this time demonstrates that he can write a novel that is as moving as it is cerebral, as poignant as it is daring." |
Revision as of 23:56, 24 December 2006
06/12/97 - The New York Review of Books Louis Menand: "By appropriating the loose and baggy forms of Sterne and Swift, Pynchon has found an ideal vehicle for his meditation on the worlds that were lost, and the suffering that was caused, just so people could understand one another better. He has produced a work of cultural anthropology, a Tristes Tropiques of North American civilization, and an astonishing and wonderful book."
06/97 - Electronic Book Review - Elizabeth Jane Wall Hinds: "Beyond the "factual" history, what Mason & Dixon more elegantly delivers is a history re-imagined, an alternative to recorded history, in the form of what one might call the "paranormal": reading Mason & Dixon is like a visit to Charles Wilson Peale's museum, itself an eighteenth-century creation, with its oddities and "freaks of nature" just close enough to verifiable facticity to look believable..."
05/18/97 - New York Times Book Review - T. Coraghessan Boyle: "This is the old Pynchon, the true Pynchon, the best Pynchon of all. Mason & Dixon is a groundbreaking book, a book of heart and fire and genius, and there is nothing quite like it in our literature, except maybe V. and Gravity's Rainbow."
04/29/97 - New York Times - Michiko Kakutani: "As rendered by Pynchon, Mason & Dixon is not simply the story of these two men's intertwined lives and their personal search for knowledge. It's also a hugely ambitious epic about America and the Age of Reason and the origins of modernity that showcases all of Pynchon's prodigious gifts as a writer: his magician's ability to fuse history and fable, science and science fiction; his Swiftean grasp of satire and his vaudevillian's sense of farce. It is a book that testifies to his remarkable powers of invention and his sheer power as a storyteller, a storyteller who this time demonstrates that he can write a novel that is as moving as it is cerebral, as poignant as it is daring."