Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mason & Dixon covers"
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Since all M&D covers are essentially the same, do we really need this page? [[User:Torerye|Torerye]] 01:54, 25 January 2007 (PST) | Since all M&D covers are essentially the same, do we really need this page? [[User:Torerye|Torerye]] 01:54, 25 January 2007 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I only have the first edition in front of me, but they are different arn't they? Some only have one cover, others a two-layered thing.--[[User:Jeffersonista|Jordan]] 11:13, 25 January 2007 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes, but this difference wouldn't show up in a jpeg. Other Pynchon novels have significantly different covers and it makes perfect sense to show these different covers, but all editions of M&D, as far as I know, are just variations on the original cover by Raquel Jaramillo, and it seems a bit redundant to show a number of more or less identical covers. [[User:Torerye|Torerye]] 01:28, 26 January 2007 (PST) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:28, 26 January 2007
Since all M&D covers are essentially the same, do we really need this page? Torerye 01:54, 25 January 2007 (PST)
I only have the first edition in front of me, but they are different arn't they? Some only have one cover, others a two-layered thing.--Jordan 11:13, 25 January 2007 (PST)
Yes, but this difference wouldn't show up in a jpeg. Other Pynchon novels have significantly different covers and it makes perfect sense to show these different covers, but all editions of M&D, as far as I know, are just variations on the original cover by Raquel Jaramillo, and it seems a bit redundant to show a number of more or less identical covers. Torerye 01:28, 26 January 2007 (PST)
